ARCHIVES

Category Archives: Commentary

Is Older Happier?

It is according to William Falk, Editor of  The Week:

Thank God I’m no longer in my 20s. Back then, I was so full of energy and enthusiasm that I could work all day and head off to play basketball for three hours, so fit and active that I could eat Herculean quantities of food and never gain an ounce. My hair was dark and thick and wavy, and there were times when several women vied for my attentions; I was so free and unencumbered by responsibility that I could stay out half the night, drinking and carousing, with no ill effect. But was I happy? Funny you should ask. A new study of 350,000 people (see Health & Science) found that people in the turbulent rapids of life, in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, are actually quite unhappy most of the time—stressed, confused, full of self-doubt. When we reach the flat water of our 50s, 60s, and 70s, we become more content and more peaceful. Happier.

My experience exactly. When women stopped paying attention to me some years ago, it liberated me to concentrate on other things, such as tending to my backyard tomato patch. Eating to my heart’s content? Mere gluttony, best outgrown. I admit that I sometimes miss soaring through the air on a basketball court, but let’s face it. All that leaping about is juvenile. It’s more efficient to pedal the stationary bike in the basement, while watching Meet the Press. At times, when I catch a reflection of my older self in a store window, I wonder, “Who the hell is that?” But my graying hair is more distinguished than the virile mop of callow youth, and my wrinkles, incipient jowls, and paunch are signs of character. Take heart, friends: You and I are not getting older. We’re getting happier.

William Falk

Editor’s Letter: Older Is Happier

Should Visitability Be A Federal Law?

Visitable home has no-step entry. Photo By: Emory Baldwin

“When someone builds a home, they’re not just building it for themselves — that home’s going to be around for a 100 years.” –Eleanor Smith, Founder of Concrete Change

By Barbara Manning

Barbara Manning is a freelance communicator who uses dynamic words and images to communicate clear and convincing messages in web, print, and interactive media.
 

Could Visitability Be More Important Than Healthcare?

According to the United Cerebral Palsy’s State of Disability there are 54 million people living with disabilities in America. The United States has a generally aging population; 2005 Census statistics indicate that there are 78.2 million aging Baby Boomers in America. At any time, an individual can develop a temporary disability. Unintentional falls are in the top ten of the list of injuries leading to an emergency room visit or hospitalization.

What can an individual do after breaking a leg if they live in a home with the bathroom on the second floor? They can seriously limit their fluid intake and only use the bathroom once or twice per day. What does an individual do if they break a hip? Every year, thousands of Americans face this same question. It is not enough for disability advocates to argue for Visitability on a state-by-state basis. Visitability must become a national priority. Too often individuals become prisoners in their homes because they can’t safely navigate the steps. Visitability could liberate millions of people living in isolation from their friends, neighbors, and communities.

What is Visitability?

The Americans with Disabilities Act requires access for people with disabilities for all new multi-family dwellings and a small percentage (5%) of single-family homes constructed using public funds. This law obviously does not address the vast majority of single-family housing in the United States.

Visitability seeks to make new housing accessible by having it meet three basic conditions:

  1. hallways and doorways wide enough for safe navigation by wheelchairs
  2. one zero-step entrance with a wheelchair approachable route
  3. one wheelchair-accessible bathroom on the main floor

Just making these three changes in the design of new homes is a cost-effective way for people to maintain their independence. Most people living with a disability will tell you that their biggest issue is living in a world that does not consciously accommodate their needs. A lack of easy access denies those who need it opportunities to interact, socialize, create, and enjoy friendships.

Gibbons’ First Five Health Technology Trends for 2010

Chris Gibbons Associate Director, John Hopkins Urban Health Institute

Chris Gibbons,
Associate Director, John Hopkins Urban Health Institute

Chris Gibbons, with the John Hopkins Urban Health Institute, shares his predictions for the “most promising health technology trends that may prove significant in the year ahead”, the first five are:

  1. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) - expect huge growth in this area mostly because of the more than $30 billion worth of incentives due to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) 
  2. Electronic Health Records (EHR)/Personal Health Records (PHR) – usage will grow, one reason, more patients want more control and access to their own information.  Wonder what the difference is between an EHR and PHR? Who enters the information and who owns it. EHRs are thought to be owned by the healthcare provider who is also entering the information. Whereas information entered in a PHR can be by anyone, including the patient, and is generally considered to be the patient’s property. 
  3. Telemedicine/Telehealth – this method of care is experiencing resurgence due in part to increasing computer processing power allowing for better audio and video communications and decreasing costs. 
  4. Populomics – a new comprehensive way to study health problems and create solutions by looking at the whole picture: psychological and physical traits, cultural and ethnic identities, home, work, school environments as well as a person’s health beliefs. 
  5. Health improvement Technology (HiT) – the next evolution of health information technology representing the shift from developing another electronic gadget to making a electronic tool designed to actually improve specific healthcare need.

Is the UK out in front of others, including the US, when it comes to smart homes, telecare and telehealthcare technology adoption?

This is one of  the questions Brian Dolan with Mobihealthnews asked George McGinnis with the Assistive Technology Programme at the NHS Connecting for Health in the UK.  The short answer is “yes”.

“The UK starts from a position where we have state provided social care. With that we had a history of using technology and social care to move people out of residential care homes and keep them in their own homes. There is a significant infrastructure there already” said MacGinnis.  “In terms of penetration rate,  we have upwards of 1 million people who enjoy some form of remote monitoring technology and around 300,000 or more ‘smart homes’ are already out there and wired. That’s probably very different from what is classically talked about more often in places like the US, for instance, in terms of chronic disease management. [For chronic disease management] we are starting out along with everyone else — we are still in the stage of early pilots.”

Below is the full video interview:

age in place at home - it's where you want to be.